Once every other week, we have a class that focuses on topics that
physicians must be aware of, mainly dealing with ethical dilemmas that
physicians face. Med students call this class "how to be a good doctor"
and some don't really think much of it, but it's a nice break from all
the studying.
Today's topic involved abortion. Not really whether
or not we were prolife or prochoice, but whether or not doctors have a
duty to treat everyone, even if goes against the doctor's views. For
example, do we believe that OB/GYNs have a responsibility as physicians
to perform abortions, or does his or her conscience and beliefs overrule
this obligation to the patient.
Although my beliefs
aren't as strong and solidified as I would want them to be, I know I
would not be comfortable with performing abortions. I do believe that a
life starts at conception, and even though a woman has rights to her
body, the fetus also has rights as well. BUT this does not mean that I
condone abortion, nor do i think that legislation should be passed that
prohibits abortion. It's like saying, "Oh since lying is a sin, then it
should be illegal to lie" or "It's a sin to be gay, so laws should be
passed that limits the rights of gays"....oh wait I guess some
ridiculous people say that...Anyways, I think that if (for some crazy
reason) I went into OB/GYN and was asked by a patient to perform an
abortion, the right decision would be to refer her to a colleague that
is comfortable with it. If I wouldn't be comfortable performing an
abortion, I think that it would also affect my performance of the
procedure, which isn't fair to the patient.
The other
topic that arose from this discussion was the decision of some
physicians to terminate relations with a patient if there is a lack of
compliance. For example, there are pulmonologists who refuse to see
certain patients if, after a number of sessions and talks, the patient
refuses to quit smoking. Or, in another example, a physician stops
treating an obese patient if that patient makes no effort to lose
weight. Although I can't say for sure what my decision would be, I think
I sort of agree with this train of thought. The physician-patient
relationship is a two way street, and I don't think it's right for
patients to abuse medications if they are not willing to change their
lifestyles and habits. It's truly a waste of energy and money on the
healthcare system (I'll probably talk about fitness and dieting in a
future post). I don't think I would discontinue relationships with a
patient as a punishment or as an act that abuses power, but if I felt
that the connection/chemistry was not there, and if that patient would
benefit from the counseling of another competent physician, I think
referring that patient is the right thing to do. Of course I would do my
best to steer that patient in the right direction, but one can only do
so much.
Non-compliance is an interesting issue. You may see lots of residents and inpatient attendings jaded at the patient population that enters hospitals. But the outpatient world is an entirely different dimension.
ReplyDeleteWe have to always consider the root causes and reasons for non-compliance. Sometimes it's lack of proper education (failure on our part), sometimes it's financial, sometimes it's personality, etc. I couldn't do inpatient medicine because I know it would jade me, which is why I stick to peds.